Filed under: Politics | Tags: Communist, Ghandi, Mother Theresa, Politics, Socialist, Society
I had a thought this morning … has society’s unlimited access into each others lives become a source of societal control or a means to tolerance and understanding? What I mean is that we can “Google” a name and find out more than we ever wanted to know about a person. News organizations can report non-stop and analyze every detail of a person’s life ad nauseum. Is it a good thing that we are all so connected?
As I am writing this, a few thoughts have occurred to me. I have a Facebook page, and several hundred friends from all times in my life. We all have extremely diverse beliefs, speak different languages, have different backgrounds, and in many cases, would not run in the same social circles. Yet, we can come together and discuss news stories, current events, daily happenings, and no one beats up on each other or bullies another into silence.
Another thought is that I have to give great thought to every article that I publish. I have to think about who may take it the wrong way, who may be offended, and will it start some type of backlash. I know that if someone reads something they do not like, with a few keystrokes, they can know where I work, who I am, and where I live. If that person does not like what I have to say, there is the potential that they may try to retaliate or harm me or my family.
I also dislike how we have used this access into one anothers lives to harm each other. I hate that we have glimpsed the pain in Gov Sanford’s marriage, though I dislike his policies, and I find him hypocritical. I hate that the personal sexual lives of our politicians, or people in general, have now become a litmus test for who they are as a person. Why do we care about what each of us are doing in our bedrooms? The mightiest of men (and women) can be brought to their knees by a single sexual indiscretion. We are not infallible. All people are subject to temptation in all forms. What if we found that Ghandi was secretly homosexual (I do not say that he was, nor wish to imply anything)? Would we say that he was not a great man? Would we discount all of his good deeds for that one fact? What if Mother Theresa was trading sexual favors in order to gain influence for her cause? Would we deny all of the wonderful deeds that she accomplished?
I believe that this interconnectedness of the world can be a wonderful thing. If you have access to people from all over the world, you can begin to understand the story of that person, and not simply lump them into a tight category: “evil-doer,” “communist,” “socialist,” “different.” Why don’t we try instead: Mother, Father, Son, Daughter, Husband, Wife, Lover, Human.
There are so many types of people that I would never want to socialize with. I find them difficult to converse with, and their ideas about things so different than mine that I avoid discussions with them. With that said, I would not them use that as a justification for doing them harm.
I have held many labels through my life. I have many names, many titles, many duties. I am these labels, and yet, they do not define me. And yet, they do. I am Daughter and Mother and Wife and Worker and American. I have parents that love me, I have procreated, I have chosen a mate to share my life, I work to feed my family, and I wasn born in the United States. Do these labels and actions solely define me – of course not! I am these things, but I am more. I exist and for what time I have in left in this corporeal body, I hope we as a society, can begin to see past our many predjudices to the soul that exists within our neighbors.
3 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



I stumbled across your blog by accident and found it rather amusing and yet degrading to some of the best people to have ever lived. It seems quite obvious that sexual indiscretions are a part of every day life for you. I do like Governor Sanford however, due to his lack of indiscretions, he can no longer be trusted. You state that you have many titles, labels and names. Is one of yours, Liar? His is, he now lacks integrity, do you?
Comment by Boris Johnson July 11, 2009 @ 4:49 amI think that your comment illustrates the exact point that I was attempting to make with this particular blog entry. I considered whether or not to publish your comment, but I just could not pass up such a perfect example. First, I did not in anyway degrade anyone in my blog. I was merely pointing out that great people often have great flaws, and those flaws do not necessarily discount the great things that they have accomplished – case in point: Michael Jackson. As to the comment about sexual indescretions, I wonder how you would come to such a conclusion based upon what I have said. Finally, I have to wonder how you come to the conclusion that I am a liar.
Comment by kkmbs July 11, 2009 @ 10:58 amI find it funny how you considered not publishing my comment, this would indicate your weekness in dealing with a confrontational subject matter. Maybe you should have thought about your examples in your first blog a little more. Yes, I would agree that Michael Jackson may have been a more suitable example but not mother Theresa and Ghandi for petes sake. As to my comment regarding sexual indescretions, I have been around long enough in life to know that when “sexual indescretions” are overlooked by one it is normally because he/she is guilty of the same. Last but not least, please read my post again, I never concluded that you were a liar. I simply restated part of your sentence and simply asked a question. I was talking about Sanford, “Is one of yours, Liar? His is, he now lacks integrity, do you?” This whole section is regarding someone being unfaithful, untruthful who lost most of his integrity in the public eye. Your blog puts out totally confusing messages as well. You seem to wish to get along with everyone no matter what they do but on the other hand, you state that you would never want to socialize with some or you would never converse with them and avoid all contact with them. I enjoyed commenting on your blog but it seemed to upset you, it was not my intention to do so.
Comment by Boris Johnson July 12, 2009 @ 4:50 am